Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 132
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 117 - Napa, CA - March 2016
Agenda Location9 SUBCOMMITTEE A – AERONAUTIC AND SURFACE VEHICLES
9.3 F-16 Automatic Air and Ground Collision Avoidance Systems
TitleF-16 Automatic Air and Ground Collision Avoidance Systems
PresenterCharles Eger and Rebecca Mitchell
AffiliationUSAF Flight Tet Center
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractThis presentation provides an overview of the design and testing of the F-16 Automatic Ground and Air Collision Avoidance Systems (Auto GCAS and Auto ACAS). Auto GCAS and Auto ACAS are designed to prevent controlled flight into terrain and mid-air mishaps, respectively. These systems differ from previous ground and mid-air warning systems in that they require neither pilot action nor consent for the system to take control of the aircraft and perform an evasive maneuver. The testing of both systems required assessing collision avoidance performance while never actually relying on the system under test, necessitating the need for unique flight test methods. Though Auto GCAS and Auto ACAS are similar automatic systems designed to prevent collisions by executing a planned trajectory, different techniques are used to execute effective flight test.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org