Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 132
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 95 - Salt Lake City - March 2005
Agenda Location4 GENERAL COMMITTEE TECHNICAL SESSION
4.2 Research Institutions, Industry and University Reports
4.2.1 Research Institutes and Companies
4.2.1.8 Calspan
TitleCalspan
PresenterLou Knotts
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractThe former General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems business operations related to flight and aerospace research are now an independent small business known as Calspan Corporation based in Buffalo, NY.

The following topics were discussed:
Divestiture by General Dynamics
New Niagara Falls Hangar
Additional Learjet In-flight Simulator
Automatic Aerial Refueling Project
FAA Upset Recovery Training

General Dynamics chose to divest much of the aeronautical research operations of the former Veridian Corporation and dialogue related to this activity took place throughout 2004. Finally, in mid February 2005 the Buffalo Aero and Transportation Testing operations were divested to a local management group. This business which consists of the Flight Research operation, the Transonic Wind Tunnel, the Transportation Science Center, the Crash Data Research Center, and the System Integration operation became Calspan Corporation (again) at that time.

The new Flight Research hangar at the Niagara Falls Airport is nearly complete. The Calspan research aircraft were relocated to the hangar in late November 2004. Some of the engineering spaces including electronic shops and the machine shop were complete at that time. The remainder of the complex will be complete and occupied by April 2005.

An additional Learjet Model 25D was acquired in late February in order to modify it into an in-flight simulator. This effort will take approximately 1 year and cost slightly under $2M. The purpose of this aircraft will predominantly be to provide a platform to support Upset Recovery Training demand and eventually to replace the first Learjet in-flight simulator which has been in operation for 24 years.

Discussion of 2 current technical projects:

The first project discussed is the continuation of the Automated Aerial Refueling project for AFRL. In this project the Learjet is used as a surrogate for J-UCAS. EO and Precision GPS sensors were installed and evaluated with respect to a NYANG KC-135 tanker last fall. This coming summer the engines of the Learjet will be modified to include servo control in order to provide x-axis control of the Learjet. Closed loop control tests in the refueling position are planned for the summer of 2006.
The FAA Upset Recovery Training project is continuing again this year. The goal is to optimize airborne training for airline pilots in order to reduce the loss of control accidents in the Air Transport community. Over 200 pilots have received this training so far and the response has been very positive. Data is being collected on the training flights in order to help determine the efficacy of the training. Based on the “Recovery Rating” scores (similar to Cooper-Harper) gathered from the training subjects the data shows that pilots who have moderate to high confidence of recovery from upset events jumps from 51% to 99% after receiving this airborne training. Pilots who feel that their loss-of-control recoveries are in doubt drop from 49% to 1% following the airborne training. Several air carriers are now in discussion with Calspan to include this training routinely in their Captain training.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org