Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 132
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 112 - Annapolis, Maryland - October 2013
Agenda Location4 GENERAL COMMITTEE TECHNICAL SESSION
4.1 Research Institutions, Industry, and University Reports
4.1.3 Research Institutions and Companies
4.1.3.2 Systems Technology, Inc.
TitleSystems Technology, Inc.
PresenterDave Klyde
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractThe ARISTOTEL Final Workshop, TU Delft Amsterdam
ARISTOTEL (www.aristotel-project.eu) was a three year project funded by the EU that featured 10 university and research institute participants from throughout Europe. The project’s challenge was to contribute to aircraft safety by providing solutions to reduce aircraft and rotorcraft accidents caused by a particularly insidious type of phenomena: aircraft/rotorcraft-pilot-couplings (A/RPCs). The goal of this project was to develop the design tools and techniques needed to predict, detect, and alleviate A/RPC problems for both existing and future aircraft and rotorcraft. A summary of the project’s results were presented in a final workshop on 23 September 2013 at TU Delft in the Netherlands. STI was invited to participate in the final workshop as a keynote speaker to provide a US perspective. Dr. Gareth Padfield, recently retired from the University of Liverpool, also served as a keynote speaker.

The Real-Flight Approach to Assess Flight Simulator Force Cueing Fidelity
For a full slate of reasons that includes economics and aging fleets, the role of simulation in tactical pilot training continues to expand. For decades researchers have been defining ways to assess simulator fidelity that have produced important results and useful metrics. Yet, true measures of positive transfer of training from simulator to flight remain elusive. To address this need, the Real-Flight process is introduced as a means to provide a full spectrum of quantitative and qualitative measures that can provide a means to assess the transfer of training question. This flight-centered approach uses a suite of task performance, pilot-vehicle system, psychophysiological, and pilot opinion measures that offers an assessment pathway. The Real-Flight method is not intended as a “black box” approach where data goes “in” and an assessment comes “out.” Instead, it provides the tools by which the trainer can make the required evaluation. In the program described herein, five test pilot participants flew a set of evaluation tasks approved by Air Force subject matter experts and then repeated the flight test sortie in a fixed base simulator using two types of force cueing inceptors. This paper presents the results for a pitch axis tracking task. The findings indicate that the selected metrics were sensitive to the similarities and differences between flight and simulation and to variations in simulator fidelity.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org