Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 133
(coming soon)

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 114 - Cleveland, Ohio - October 2014
Agenda Location4 GENERAL COMMITTEE TECHNICAL SESSION
4.1 Research Institutions, Industry, and University Summary Reports
4.1.3 Research Institutions and Companies
4.1.3.1 Systems Technology, Inc.
TitleSystems Technology, Inc.
PresenterDave Klyde
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractSAFE-Cue Warning Display

A study conducted by The Boeing Company of world-wide commercial jet transport accidents found the most common events to be loss of control associated with an inability of pilots to recover from upsets and unusual attitudes. A key component in some of these events is pilot spatial disorientation (SD). Improved pilot training in these abnormal flight conditions, including the ability of training simulators to replicate spatial disorientation, is needed to reduce loss of control accidents. Traditional commercial pilot training is conducted with hexapod-based motion systems that are limited in their ability to replicate the motion cues associated with these events. Given these short-comings, how can air carriers and other stakeholders be certain that there is positive transfer of training regarding spatial disorientation from the simulator to flight? To address this question, Systems Technology, Inc. (STI) is developing SD training scenarios designed for Level D flight simulators and the Spatial Disorientation – Transfer of Training Assessment Library (SD-TOTAL) software application that will provide tools to quantify the ability of flight simulators to create SD for pilot training.

Performance Adaptive Wing

The following abstract was extracted from the NASA NRA proposal submitted by a team led by the University of Minnesota with Systems Technology, Inc., Virginia Tech, CMSoft, Schmidt and Associates, and Aurora Flight Sciences.

This program will mature integrated multidisciplinary tools, techniques, technology, and processes to cultivate an innovative “research through development” approach to create a performance adaptive aeroelastic wing. This philosophy exploits valuable knowledge gained from prototype flight experiments to validate and drive advances in modeling, controls, optimization, effector/sensor selection and designprocesses. The wing structure, which will leverage Multi-Disciplinary Analysis and Optimization and curvilinear SpaRibs, will be designed with minimal weight to handle static loading. The design will optimally include many distributed control effectors and a large distributed sensor network enabling innovative control solutions for flutter suppression and alleviation of gust and turbulence loading, further decreasing the structural weight. Outer-loop control laws will optimally alter the wing shape and load distribution at varying conditions across the flight envelope adaptively minimizing drag and providing high lift for takeoff and landing. This research will accomplish NASA N+3 goals and will build upon work at Ames Research Center (ARC) in elastically shaped air vehicles and Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC) in the modeling of flexible vehicles, active flutter suppression, and optimal control algorithms. Interaction with ARC and AFRC is planned including flight testing on the X-56A over the course of a potential five year program.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org