Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 133
(coming soon)

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 118 - Minneapolis, MN - October 2016
Agenda Location4 GENERAL COMMITTEE TECHNICAL SESSION
4.2 Research Institutions, Industry, and University Reports
4.2.1 Research Institutions and Companies
4.2.1.7 Crew Systems
TitleCrew Systems
PresenterDick Newman
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractWe have programs in three areas: Unmanned Aircraft, Airworthiness Findings, and Spatial Disorientation Modeling. Our efforts in unmanned aircraft (UAVs) have been to review mishaps and develop risk-based airworthiness and operational requirements for safe operation. UAVs have had a poor safety record because of a lack of redundancy in critical components, particularly in their flight control systems and propulsion systems. We have conducted a risk assessment for small civil UAVs (up to 55 lb). Our approach estimates the risk to the general public. This approach is currently used by the FAA to assess the risk of commercial space launch mishaps. The results indicate that current flight control and propulsion reliabilities do not support safe UAV operations in congested areas. The midair collision risk with transport airplanes appears acceptable. Small unmanned helicopters pose particular risks and may not be safe to operate in urban environments.
Other projects include acting as a Designated Engineering Representative performing airworthiness approvals for TCAS, ADS-B, and cockpit instrumentation. We have also just begun consulting on Spatial Disorientation Modeling.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org