Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(please log in first)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 133
(coming soon)

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 108 - Gettysburg - October 2011
Agenda Location10 SUBCOMMITTEE D – DYNAMICS, COMPUTATIONS, AND ANALYSIS
10.3 High Altitude Airship Research
TitleHigh Altitude Airship Research
PresenterThomas Myers
AffiliationSystems Technology, Inc.
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractHigh Altitude Airship Research
ACGS Gettysburg October 2011
Tom Myers, Systems Technology, Inc.

Systems Technology, Inc. recently completed a Phase II SBIR for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) dealing with control and guidance for the High Altitude Airship (HAATM) being developed by the Lockheed Martin Company. Airships differ from aircraft in that buoyancy (aerostatic) and apparent mass (unsteady aerodynamic) effects are significant only for airships. The mathematical representation of the apparent mass effects is embodied in Kirchhoff’s equations in which the apparent mass terms appear as tensors. One consequence is that it’s convenient to formulate the equations of motion in a body axis system with origin at the hull center as opposed to the center of mass.

The possibility that maintaining the hull pressure difference at a fixed constant value during descent could reduce fatigue in the hull material led to a study of decent control laws to accomplish this. A simple analytical solution was compared to an optimal trajectory solution from direct collocation optimization. The analytical solution assumed a constant blower volumetric flow rate with airspeed variation as the control variable whereas the optimal (minimum time) solution used blower flow rate and airspeed as controls. It was found that the analytical solution could be extended to give a result comparable to the optimal solution without the need to run the trajectory optimization algorithm in flight.

High-altitude stationkeeping is a major problem for the HAA due to limited maximum airspeed. Thus three control laws were considered for Post Thrust Limit (PTL) operation in which the wind speeds can exceed the airspeed. The first two control laws involve minimum displacement and minimum groundspeed respectively and the third is an extension of the minimum groundspeed law which returns the airship to station after the high wind event has passsed. Comparison of the three control laws shows that the third performs better than the first two. However, examination of actual wind data in the lower stratosphere revealed an annual high wind event called the “polar vortex breakdown” which can result in winds in excess of 40 m/s. In these events good stationkeeping is almost certainly impractical regardless of the stationkeeping control laws. However, these events can be predicted accurately with numerical weather prediction so that the vehicle can be moved to a safe haven before the event.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org