Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(Coming Soon!)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 94 - Reno - November 2004
Agenda Location9 SUBCOMMITTEE D – Dynamics, Computations and Analysis
9.1 Loss of Control Inhibitor System (LOCIS)
TitleLoss of Control Inhibitor System (LOCIS)
PresenterRalph A’Harrah
AffiliationNASA Headquarters
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractCurrent commercial aircraft exhibit uneven responses of the primary flight control surfaces to aggressive pilot control commands, resulting in a marked deterioration in the pilot's ability to control his aircraft, at a minimum, and can cause catastrophic loss of control, and loss of the aircraft. For older aircraft having mechanical control systems, this loss of harmony between the pilot and the control surface response can be attributed to the system compliance (e.g., stretching of the control cables, flexing of the push rods, servo valve distortion,) causing dynamic distortion of the control system hysteresis. In contemporary aircraft having fly-by-wire control systems, the major contributor to this loss of harmony between the pilot and the control surface is attributed to the control system time delays (resulting from the combination such items as computer cycle time, control shaping, filtering, aliasing, servo valve distortion, actuator rate limiting) between the pilots commands and the resulting responses of the flight control surfaces. In addition, on fly-by-wire aircraft, there is no feedback though the controls to the pilot on the state of the control system, such as surface flutter, surface jam, position limiting, actuator rate limiting, and the control limiting imposed by the operational envelop limits.

The subject innovation would maintain harmony between the pilot's commands and the control surface responses, while providing improved feedback to the pilot on the state of his control system.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org