Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(Coming Soon!)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 124 - Williamsburg, VA - October 2019
Agenda Location7 SUBCOMMITTEE B – MISSILES AND SPACE
7.4 Development of the Apollo Lunar Module Digital Autopilot
TitleDevelopment of the Apollo Lunar Module Digital Autopilot
PresenterJohn Tylko
AffiliationMIT
Available Downloads*presentation
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractMidway through the Apollo program, NASA challenged its contractors to evaluate options for improving performance while reducing operational risk. Digital flight control offered significant benefits over the analog systems originally under development, including the ability to control the combined Apollo spacecraft “stack” using the Lunar Module’s Descent Propulsion System which had been designed with limited gimbal control authority. Grumman’s engineers initially challenged MIT’s approach, arguing that a digital autopilot would consume the limited computational capacity of the Apollo Guidance Computer. MIT prevailed when both teams presented their arguments to NASA’s technical leadership.

Taking Michael Athans’ first class on optimal control theory, Instrumentation Laboratory engineers George Cherry and Bill Widnall applied Pontryagin’s recently published maximum principal to develop a minimum-time thrust-vector control law which could be successfully implemented in the Apollo Guidance Computer. Making extensive use of both digital and hybrid simulation, including Grumman’s hardware in the loop simulation, they refined and validated this design over the next three years.

The Lunar Module Digital Autopilot was first used to control the combined spacecraft during the Apollo 9 mission in 1969. It proved essential in saving the Apollo 13 mission a year later, after the spacecraft’s primary propulsion system was disabled, necessitating two critical burns of the LM Descent Propulsion System to put the spacecraft back on a free return trajectory and to accelerate the return to Earth.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org